Anthrax Scare – FBI Moves In

Warning road sign with exclamation mark against a cloudy sky
Photo: Kevin George / Shutterstock

Prosecutors say a Quincy man mailed salt in letters to Illinois members of Congress to make it look like anthrax, and he allegedly admitted it.

Story Snapshot

  • Federal prosecutors charged Matthew Unglesbee with mailing threats and hoax letters.
  • At least four envelopes with white granules reached congressional offices in Chicago.
  • Notes read “HA HA” and “HAH enjoy the gift,” per the complaint summaries.
  • Tests found the substance was not hazardous and identified as salt in reports.

Charges, Targets, And The White Powder That Wasn’t

The United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of Illinois charged Matthew G. Unglesbee with mailing threatening communications and false information or hoaxes under federal law. The complaint was unsealed on October 26, 2026, after his arrest. Reports say at least four letters reached congressional offices in Chicago. Each came in a plain white envelope addressed by hand. The return address showed Unglesbee’s name and Quincy home address, according to multiple accounts.

Three of the letters included the note “HA HA.” A fourth read “HAH enjoy the gift,” based on media descriptions of the complaint and affidavit. Office staff treated each envelope as a real hazard. Response teams and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) moved in, as they should. The first duty is to secure people and preserve evidence when powder appears with a taunt. That is not theater. That is standard safety after 2001.

What Testing Showed And Why It Still Triggered Alarms

Field and follow-up tests showed the white substance was not dangerous. Multiple outlets reported it was identified as salt. That result matched the ease of a hoax and the speed of a scare. The public may ask why salt causes such a stir. The answer is simple. Envelopes with powder can kill. First responders do not get to gamble. If someone mails a look-alike, they intend fear and chaos. The law treats that intent as the harm.

The Chicago Tribune reported that one sample was determined to be salt, and that the envelopes came from a Quincy return address. The Hill likewise reported the material tested as salt and described the emergency actions at the offices. These are not isolated slip-ups or a prank gone sideways. These steps strain staff, pull hazmat teams, and halt public business. That is a cost the public bears every time someone plays with panic.

Affidavit Details And The Government’s Theory

The Chicago Sun-Times reported that an FBI affidavit attributes an admission to Unglesbee. He allegedly said he mailed the four letters and used salt because it looked like anthrax. Prosecutors often rely on simple facts to prove intent. Powder that resembles a deadly agent. A note that mocks the target. A return address that points back to the sender. Each fact can be small on its own. Together, they build a case the jury can hold.

The Department of Justice said the case rests on a complaint at this stage, which is an accusation rather than a finding of guilt. That caveat aside, the alleged conduct aligns with a known pattern. White-powder scares surged after the 2001 attacks and never fully stopped. The Washington Post has chronicled similar incidents and responses over the years, and this case fits that mold. The point is deterrence: make hoaxes costly for the hoaxers, not for the public.

Security, Common Sense, And The Line Between Taunt And Threat

Defense lawyers may argue the notes did not spell out a threat. Prosecutors will answer with context and common sense. Mail a powder that looks like anthrax to a federal office, and the message speaks for itself. American law respects free speech. It does not protect false alarms that weaponize fear. A short scrawl of “HA HA” beside a handful of salt is not satire. It is a trigger for evacuation, testing, and dread. That is why Congress criminalized hoaxes.

Conservative values start with order and accountability. Public servants should do their jobs without facing staged scares. Taxpayers should not fund emergency drills for someone’s thrill. If the facts hold in court, a clear sentence signals that stunts that mimic terror will meet real time. That protects staff on the front lines who open the mail, the teams who rush in, and the voters whose workday gets hijacked by a grain of salt and a grin.

Sources:

nbcnews.com, fox32chicago.com, abc7chicago.com, chicagotribune.com, washingtonpost.com, chicago.suntimes.com, thehill.com